Efficacy and Safety air quality

Efficacy and Safety: Critical Partners in Disinfection Technology

When selecting disinfection methods for mechanical systems, both efficacy and safety demand equal attention. While many focus primarily on a system’s ability to eliminate pathogens, the safety implications of these technologies can make or break their real-world viability. The ASHRAE 241 standard addresses this crucial balance by providing comprehensive testing protocols for both effectiveness and safety of disinfection systems.

Understanding Safety Requirements Under ASHRAE 241

Ozone Production Control

Electronic air cleaners frequently generate ozone as a byproduct, which poses significant respiratory risks in occupied spaces. Despite its historical use as a disinfectant, ozone is now recognized as hazardous in inhabited areas. ASHRAE 241 mandates compliance with the UL2998 standard, limiting ozone production to 0.005 ppm or less during UL testing procedures. Some facilities may alternatively adopt the California Air Resources Board (CARB) standard of 0.05 ppm for occupied spaces. Both standards utilize UL867 Section 40 testing methodology, measuring ozone levels 2 inches from potential emission sources. It’s important to note that ozone concentrations decrease significantly with distance – readings taken 2-3 feet away in a duct will show markedly lower levels due to rapid dissipation.

Secondary Reaction Prevention

A critical concern with electronic air cleaners is the potential formation of harmful byproducts during the disinfection process. Technologies that effectively eliminate pathogens might simultaneously create more dangerous compounds. ASHRAE 241 addresses this risk through chamber testing that measures formaldehyde production following limonene injection.

Particulate Generation

Indoor air quality depends heavily on particulate control. ASHRAE 241 requires verification that disinfection technologies do not generate additional particulate matter during operation – a crucial consideration for maintaining clean air environments.

Acoustic Considerations

The COVID-19 pandemic taught us an unexpected lesson about safety compliance: noise levels matter. When disinfection devices generate excessive noise, occupants often disable them, negating their protective benefits. Many portable units deployed during the pandemic were ultimately abandoned due to their disruptive noise levels. ASHRAE 241 recognizes acoustic performance as a key factor in sustained operational effectiveness.

Unified Testing Protocol

A distinctive strength of ASHRAE 241 lies in its integrated testing approach. Safety and efficacy testing must be conducted on the same device in the same chamber, preventing manufacturers from using different variants to achieve separate safety and efficacy certifications. This unified protocol ensures that performance claims reflect real-world operation.

Making Informed Selections

For mechanical engineers, choosing disinfection technologies tested to ASHRAE 241 standards represents an investment in comprehensive protection. These systems are designed to: – Minimize exposure to hazardous substances – Maintain compliance with rigorous safety protocols – Ensure long-term operational sustainability While alternative disinfection methods may demonstrate effectiveness in isolated metrics, ASHRAE 241-certified technologies offer validated performance across both safety and efficacy parameters. This comprehensive validation makes them particularly suitable for critical environments where reliability and safety cannot be compromised.

Register to receive emails for future blogs.